http://www.sida.se/gwp/

 

INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF BASIN ORGANIZATIONS

 

INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

 

ASSOCIATED PROGRAM :
" DEVELOPING AND STRENGTHENING RIVER BASIN ORGANIZATIONS "

 

VERSION N°9, INBO General Assembly

 

 

INBO
21, rue de Madrid
75008 PARIS
FRANCE

LANBO
Avenida Plateros 211
Colonia Carretas
76180 QUERETARO, Qro CP
MEXIQUE

CEE-TAC
Kvassay Jenö ut 1
P.O. BOX 27
1095 BUDAPEST
HONGRIE

SAS-TAC
P.O. Box 2075
IWMI
COLOMBO
SRI LANKA

 

 

 

q Introduction

Since its establishment in 1996, the Global Water Partnership (GWP) has instigated priority actions to promote Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) worldwide.

Today, the International Network of Basin Organizations, created in 1994 during Aix-les-Bains Constitutive Conference (France) gathers more than 125 members or observers in 42 countries over the world.

The General Assembly of INBO held in Salvador de Bahia, December 1998, decided to devote more efforts in sharing the experience of INBO Members. Contacts have therefore been established with a number of partners, including the European Union, The World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the Organization of American States, the Global Water Partnership, bilateral French, Dutch, Spanish or German cooperation, etc.

This Associated Program was initiated and will be developed in close collaboration with other initiatives launched under the aegis of the GWP. INBO and several other INBO members-organizations are members of GWP. Mr. R. Garrido, the Network's President and Federal Secretary for Water Resources in Brazil, was elected member of the "Partnership" Management Committee. Most existing basin organizations are already, or should become active members of the Regional Water Partnerships (RTACs of GWP) and cooperate within such a framework.

The aim of this Associated Program is to help solve the problems encountered in the countries interested in finding appropriate organization systems and water management tools which fit the conditions of a particular basin while benefiting from the experience accumulated worldwide.

q RIVER BASIN ORGANIZATIONS

In the following, a River Basin Organization is defined in a broad sense, and includes all kinds of organizations as long as they respect the broad definition retained by INBO and in the World Water Forum topic " WATER IN RIVERS ": " Agencies, or coordinating bodies, which are responsible to all stakeholders within the large hydrographic river basin and which are adequately financed so that they can achieve their remit. This remit should include balancing the aspirations of all stakeholders and will include responsibility for flood mitigation, water resources, environmental conservation, public health (water quality), navigation, amenity etc. These agencies, or coordinating bodies, should promote a general understanding of all the issues and should encourage dialogue and participation. ".

q REGIONAL NETWORKS

On proposal of member organizations and permanent observers belonging to the same geographic region, "Regional Networks" can be created within INBO in order to:

q OBJECTIVES OF THE GWP ASSOCIATED PROGRAM

The overall goal of the proposed " Associated Program " is to upgrade and support the development of any organizational initiatives for integrated water resources management in river basins/lake basins/aquifer level, where there is a felt need, while bringing into focus the many assumptions and paradigms which underpin the search for reconciliation of economic growth, social equity, environmental conservation and protection of water resources, and participation of the Civil Society.

 

4 main initial outputs are expected :

direct cooperation established between existing, future or pilot basin organizations through twinning agreements;

mobilization within existing basin organizations of professional support capacities in order to facilitate the setting up or development of new basin organizations and the debate on their management options;

ƒ a synthesis of available knowledge and know-how, of best practices, preparation of recommendations or guidelines and drawing-up of training modules;

the networking of water documentation systems, to share and get access to useful institutional, legal, economic and technical information at the international level.

These 4 expected main outputs are clearly meant to reinforce each other in achieving the best services to offer.

For example, the strategic support mobilized in output 2 will be seconded by the knowledge base developed for output 3 and disseminated by the documentation system organized for Output 4. Outputs 2, 3 and 4 can obviously be enhanced in the context of output 1 to enrich direct cooperation between basin organizations.

Outputs 3 and 4 are seen as contributing to the GWP Associated Program aiming at setting up an Information System on "integrated water resources management" with a "knowledge of basin organizations" perspective. The program will also develop strong linkages with the efforts undertaken in the area of institutional capacity building for integrated water resources management (IWRM) through the UNDP "CAPNET" project.

In addition, all GWP initiatives benefit from close interaction with regional groups (RTACs and forthcoming Regional Water Partnerships), which is meant to ensure broad adequacy between services provided through APs and real needs in the field. The Program will develop into a dialogue with these GWP regional groups on the basin organization issues in each region.

 

OUTPUT 1 : Twinning for direct cooperation between existing, future or pilot river basin organizations :

l Purpose:

To stimulate and support water management at river basin level, the twinning of river basin organizations is presented as a tool for obtaining tangible results. Furthermore, by using this concept, obligations of many international agreements can be implemented effectively.

l Proposed services:

 

 

OUTPUT 2 : Mobilization of professional support capacities

in existing organizations to help with the setting-up

and development of new basin organizations

and with their management options

l Purpose:

It is useful to make available multidisciplinary and multinational teams of experimented specialists-facilitators, coming from existing basin organizations, to help making progress, on request, in this long process of discussion, reflection, dialogue, and decision-making undertaken at the level of river basins or at the national or regional level.

Contacts can be broadened to specialists from international organizations, e.g. the United Nations organizations, ICID, IPTRID& IWMI for drainage and irrigation, or the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD), the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and other recognized international or national associations, International Secretariat for Water (ISW) when needed.

l Proposed services:

OUTPUT 3 : A state of the art synthesis of available

knowledge and know-how

l Purpose:

In spite of years of practice, many problems are still encountered when integrated river basin management has to be implemented.

The service provided through this project is to collect actual practices in order to generate ideas and recommendations, and to promote practical guidelines for putting integrated river basin management into practice.

l Proposed services:

The RBO-AP, together with all collaborative partners (specialized institutes such as RBA Delft, ISW Montreal, research centers, universities, network of professionals from basin organizations, panel of experts to be set up, the Global Water Unit of the World Bank, IWSA task force for measuring water supply and sanitation utility performances, specialized program of the Africa Water Utility Partnership,...) will contribute to improving the knowledge and know-how in the area of basin organizations and IWRM, and making them available through the following activities:

 

 

OUTPUT 4 : The networking of water documentation systems

l Purpose:

" AQUADOC-INTER " is the project implemented by INBO to exchange knowledge on water resources management at river basin level and to allow all members and possible partners to share and exchange useful institutional documentation.

According to the issues of the Frankfurt meeting, 7 December 1999, the "AQUADOC-INTER" project will allow exchanges and collaboration with others networks to take place in order to :

"AQUADOC-INTER" is already implemented through the creation of two regional priority networks: Latin America, and Europe. Some organizations already participate in the project :

 

l Proposed services:

 

 

q ASSOCIATED PROGRAM COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT

The International Network of River Basin Organizations (INBO) proposes to coordinate and manage the Associated Program.

Privileged links will also be developed with particular centers of expertise such as the Center for Research on River Basin Administration of DELFT University of Technology (RBA Delft, the Netherlands), the International Secretariat for Water (ISW Montreal, Canada), and others to be identified as the program develops.

On the issue of knowledge synthesis, contacts have been initiated by INBO with officers-in-charge of the Global Water Unit of THE WORLD BANK, the Knowledge Management Network of THE WORLD BANK, the IWSA task force for Measuring Water Supply and Sanitation Utility performances, the French "Académie de l'Eau" or the Norwegian "Water Academy", etc.

INBO Permanent Technical Secretariat is already in close connection with the nascent CAPNET (IWRM associated program of GWP) and the Water Utility Partnership (WUP) associated program of GWP (project n°2 development of performance indicators and benchmarking).

At the regional level, contact has been established with the Organization of American States (OAS), the Water Utility Partnership (WUP Africa), GTZ (Southern Africa), .

INBO will work in close collaboration with the following international programs :

l The Associated Program Steering Committee

It is proposed that the Associated Program be directed by a Steering Committee made up of the members of INBO Liaison Bureau and GWP representatives (in particular the Presidents of the RTACs concerned), of representatives of bi or multilateral cooperation agencies, funding all or part of the actions included in Outputs 1 to 4, and of those of large international organizations supporting initiatives focusing on Integrated Water Resources Management at the level of river basins, (e.g. the United Nations Organizations, OAS, IWMI, PACADIRH/CCAD, etc.)

l Technical Unit

This Technical Unit would gather not only experts from INBO and LANBO Permanent Technical Secretariats but also specialists from GWP's CEE and SAS-TAC and experts from different countries or organizations interested in supporting the "Integrated Water Resources Management – Developing and Strengthening Basin Organizations" Associated Program.

N.B. List of Annexes joint to the original proposition

Annex 1 : Declaration of membership in INBO
Annex 2 : World Water Forum, The Hague, March 2000 -INBO Vision for 2025
Annex 3 : New draft statutes for INBO
Annex 4 : Worldwide system for information and documentation on integrated water resources management at basin level
Annex 5 : Official proceedings of the "Twinning" meeting - The Hague -
20 March 2000

 

q RBO - AP budget

All figures are in 1,000 US dollars

The program is proposed for a 5-years period. Indeed, some projects ought to be started as soon as possible.

In order to improve clarity, allow for partial funding and launch the program components, the budget is divided into 4 parts A, B, C, D (corresponding to the 4 expected outputs).

Please note: expenditures necessary for managing the projects on the local level are included in budgets A, B, C and D.

A fifth table E, shows expenses relative to INBO proper. These expenditures are taken into account in the Network yearly budget. The General Assembly in Krakow (end of September 2000) must approved this budget together with the new statutes and vote the corresponding budget.

As regards this associated program, expenditures are divided into two categories:

  1. the financing of members' meetings during such and such project (direct cooperation actions for instance). This mainly generates travel costs and per diems;
  2. the funding of studies and training costs, i.e. intellectual services generating fees in man/day or man/month,

Therefore, some expenses are repetitive and can be presented in "modules" usable according to the development of each item of each program budget. The following unit costs could be adopted:

All these figures can be discussed and shall vary depending on the case. Each project item will be followed up by one of the program partners (INBO, or LANBO, or CEE-TAC, or SAS-TAC, etc.) according to its capacity in gathering the financial resources required. For instance, the cost of a training program organized by CEE-TAC within the framework of Output n° 3 (Synthesis of knowledge and know-how) could differ from the cost of the same program organized by LANBO.

 

 

 

Module n°1 Hypothesis :

round trips (including national travels) estimated at 1,525 US $/ capita

sojourn (8 days) on the average 1,220 US$/ capita,

total 2,745 proposed round figure 3,000US $ / capita.

Module n°2 Hypothesis : an average budget for professional workshop with coordinator and specialist is :

preparation, state of the art : 30,000 US $

training fees : : 15,000

translation : : 4,000

logistics (10%) : : 2,000

travel & sojourn of 15 attendees : 41,175

idem pour 2 coordinators : 5,490

TOTAL: 97,665 proposed round figure: 100.000 US $

Module n°2 bis: an average mission could include :

fees 12 daysx555 US $ : 6.660

travel and sojourns : 2.745

TOTAL : 9.405 proposed round figure: 10.000US $/u

Module n°3: average budget

training fees: : 29,000 US $

translation : : 4,000

logistics (10%) : : 2,000

travel of local attendees : : 00

sojourn of local attendees (15x5j) : 11,434

travel & sojourn of coordinator (3u.) : 8,235

TOTAL : 54,669 proposed round figure: 55,000 US $/u

Module n°4: Hypothesis : An average budget to improve a river basin include:

Due to the experience in the following case : Aegean rivers (TURKEY), Sabarmati river (GUJARAT, INDIA), Rio San Juan & Rio Coco (NICARAGUA, HONDURAS & COSTA RICA), Irtysh river (KAZAKHSTAN), Vistula river (POLAND, UKRAINE, BIELORUSSIA), total cost can be comprised between US $ 320,000 (Irtysh) and 1,200,000 (Vistula) on a 3 year period, plus 10% of local costs borne by the beneficiaries.

For the purpose of the project, we propose to retain US $ 600,000, that is to say US $ 200,000/year.

 

 

- A -

 

ASSOCIATED PROGRAM BUDGET

OUTPUT N°1

Twinning arrangements for Direct Cooperation (d.c)

Between basin organizations

 

Associated Program Actions

Year 1

2001

Year 2

2002

Year 3

2003

Year 4

2004

Year 5

2005

TOTAL

Desk study and first experience

(for the record-f.r.)

f.r.

0

0

 

 

 

f.r.

(1) Meetings of resource persons

(3 persons maximum per partner) on mutual visits (see module n° 1)

 

 

1 SAM

1 SAS

(*)

 

18

1 SAM

2 SAS

1 CEE

(*)

72

2 SAM

3 SAS

1 CEE

(*)

108

3 SAM

4 SAS

2 CEE

1 AFR

(*)

180

 

 

 

 

378

(2) Organization of a joint workshop

10 local participants plus INBO coordinator (see. Module n°2)

2 d.c

200

4 d.c

400

6 d.c

600

10 d.c

1.000

 

2,200

(3) Project management by INBO coordinator

79

79

117

123

137

535

(4) Translation

lump sum

 

 

8

16

24

40

 

88

(5) Secretariat and miscellaneous

(f.r. to be financed by twin organizations)

f.r.

(6) Visits of the coordinator and experts

(combined whenever possible with those planned in output n°2)

 

f.r.

(7) Training courses

(when necessary combined, if possible, with those planned in output n°3)

 

f.r.

SUB-TOTAL IN 1,000 US $ OUTPUT n°1

79

305

605

855

1,357

3,201

 

(*) ASUMPTIONS TO BE ENDORSED

Year 1: one DC initiated by SAMTAC, plus one initiated by SASTAC = 2 DC

Year 2: plus one by CEETAC, plus one by SASTAC = 4 DC

Year 3: plus one by SAMTAC, plus one by SASTAC = 6 DC

Year 4: plus one of each regional networks including AFRICA ones : 10 DC

 

 

ESTIMATE COST FOR DIRECT COOPERATION

Direct Cooperation between two partners may generate the following costs:

Task description

Unit cost

US $

  1. Formation of a team with three resource persons maximum, in charge of establishing contacts locally, their salaries being borne by each partner, which represents part of its funding share. These people should meet at least once a year at each partner's headquarters, which implies the travel cost of twice 3 persons only as the host organization has not to pay travel cost and per diem for its own personnel (see details in module n° 1)

 

 

 

16,500/year/u

  • Direct cooperation should include a common workshop once a year, gathering about ten local people and five visiting advisors to allow a wider exchange and the dissemination of acquired experience on topics carefully prepared in advance under INBO coordinator's responsibility (see details in module n° 2).
  •  

     

     

    100,000/year/u

  • Management cost for this project associated program, is usually computed by dividing by six the cost of INBO coordinator for a mean year (details in table E).
  •  

    23,000/year/u

  • Translation cost; (assumption)
  • 4,000/year/u

  • The cost of local secretariats are mentioned for the record as it is borne by each partner, this cost being part of its funding share.
  •  

     

    f.r.

  • Expenses generated by the visits and supervision of the coordinator and possibly specialists are mentioned for the record as they are already integrated in Output n° 2 for good management practice: the coordinator can effectively combined the travels needed for these two tasks.
  •  

     

    f.r.

  • It is the same regarding training costs which could be deemed necessary for good implementation of direct cooperation.
  •  

    f.r.

    TOTAL YEARLY ESTIMATE COST FOR COOPERATION

    143,500/year/unit

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    - B -

     

    ASSOCIATED PROGRAM BUDGET

    OUTPUT N°2

    Professional support to basin organizations

     

    Associated Program Actions

     

    Year 1

    2001

    Year 2

    2002

    Year 3

    2003

    Year 4

    2004

    Year 5

    2005

     

    TOTAL

    Prof. Workshops with coordinator and specialist, and 15 attendees / twinning

    (see module n°2)

    1 SAM

    1 SAS

     

    200

    1 SAM

    2 SAS

    1 CEE

    400

    2 SAM

    3 SAS

    1 CEE

    600

    2 SAM

    4 SAS

    2 CEE

    1,000

     

     

     

    2,200

    External technical support for project evaluation, design and implementation (module n°2 bis)

    1 u.

    10

    2 u.

    20

    2 u

    20

    4 u.

    40

    "

    40

     

     

    130

    Action program for improvement of integrated water resources management with a basin organization : assumption 2 new BO/year, and 3 years of funding.

    (see module n°4)

    1 SAM

    1 SAS

     

    400

    1 SAM

    2 SAS

    1 CEE

    800

    2 SAM

    3 SAS

    1 CEE

    1,200

    2 SAM

    3 SAS

    1 CEE

    1,200

    2 SAM

    3 SAS

    1 CEE

    1,200

     

     

     

    4,800

    Work visit of ISW coordinator for professional meeting with 15 RBO attendees on users' participation

     

    200

     

    200

     

    200

     

    200

     

    200

     

    1,000

    ISW external technical support for implementation of users' participation expertise within RBOs

     

    20

     

    40

     

    20

     

    20

     

    20

     

    120

     

     

    SUB-total IN 1,000 US $

    OUTPUT n°2

     

    630

     

    1,260

     

    1,840

     

    2,060

     

    2,460

     

    8,250

    (*) ASUMPTIONS TO BE ENDORSED

    Year 1: one BO initiated by SAMTAC, plus one initiated by SASTAC = 2 BO

    Year 2: plus one by CEETAC, plus one by SASTAC = 4 BO

    Year 3: plus one by SAMTAC, plus one by SASTAC = 6 BO

    Year 4: minus 2, plus one of each regional networks = 6 BO

    Etc.

     

     

    - C -

     

    ASSOCIATED PROGRAM BUDGET

    OUTPUT N°3

    Synthesis of existing knowledge and know-how

     

    Associated Program Actions

     

    Year 1

    2001

    Year 2

    2002

    Year 3

    2003

    Year 4

    2004

    Year 5

    2005

     

    TOTAL

    SAMTAC prop. To be completed

    f.r.

    f.r

    CEETAC prop. To be completed

    f.r.

    f.r;

    SASTAC prop. To be completed

    f.r.

    f.r;

    RBA TU DELFT proposal

    To be completed

    f.r.

    f.r;

    Other proposal

    To be completed

    f.r.

    f.r.

    ISW : enhancing knowledge base & capacity building training modules on land uses mapping

    (see module n°3)

     

     

    55

     

     

     

    55

    ISW : idem on conflict prevention & resolution

    55

    55

    55

    55

    ISW : idem on users' education on water savings & IWRM

     

     

     

    110

    55

    ISW : idem on willingness & capacity to pay

    55

    55

    Training courses :

    enhancing knowledge base & capacity building training modules for new coming partners (see module n° 3)

    1 u.

     

    55

    2 u.

     

    110

     

     

     

    110

    4 u.

     

    220

     

     

     

    220

    BY-total IN 1,000 US $

    OUTPUT n°3

    (165)

    (275)

    (220)

    (330)

    (330)

    (1,320)

     

     

    - D -

     

    ASSOCIATED PROGRAM BUDGET

    OUTPUT N°4

    Networking of water documentation centers:

    " AQUADOC-INTERNATIONAL "

     

    Associated Program Actions

     

    Year 1

    2001

    Year 2

    2002

    Year 3

    2003

    Year 4

    2004

    Year 5

    2005

     

    TOTAL

    l NETWORK ARCHITECTURE

    1. Central unit architecture
    2. Regional network architecture
    3. Tools, amenities
    4. Multilingual research (Latin characters) & works
    5. Methodology (procedures, organization, format designing)

     

     

    90

    68

    61

    100

    53

     

     

    114

    46

    76

    61

    61

     

     

    122

    38

    46

    46

    30

     

     

    122

    30

    23

    31

    30

     

     

    80

    20

    15

    20

    20

     

    528

    202

    221

    258

    194

    SUB-TOTAL CENTRAL UNIT

    372

    358

    282

    236

    155

    1,403

    l CENTRAL EUROPE

    Technical support to 4 NRDCs Poland, Czech Rep., Rumania, Hungary, Plus 2 more (*)

     

    184

     

    184

     

    138

     

    92

     

    92

     

    690

    SUB TOTAL CENTRAL EUROPE

    184

    184

    138

    92

    92

    690

    l LATIN AMERICA,

    Technical support to 6 NRDCs Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina (*)

     

    138

     

    138

     

    138

     

    138

     

    138

     

    690

    SUB TOTAL LATIN AMERICA

    138

    138

    138

    138

    138

    690

    l SOUTH ASIA

    Technical support to 4 NRDCs

    (to be determined) (*)

    46

    92

    138

    138

    414

    Asian languages adaptation (**)

    f.r

    f.r.

    f.r;

    f.r.

    f.r.

    f.r.

    SUB-TOTAL SOUTH ASIA

    46

    92

    138

    138

    414

    GRAND-total IN 1,000 US $

    OUTPUT n°4

    694

    726

    650

    604

    523

    3,197

    (*) Technical support to NRDCs is made of 2 missions of 15 days twice a year per country, and 2 in & out travel per year.

    (**) Regional CEE and Latino-American networks work with Latin characters.

     

    - E -

     

     

    ASSOCIATED PROGRAM BUDGET

    Associated Program coordination and management

     

    Associated Program Actions

     

    Year 1

    2001

    Year 2

    2002

    Year 3

    2003

    Year 4

    2004

    Year 5

    2005

     

    TOTAL

    l INBO general coordination

     

    30.0

    30.0

    30.0

    30.0

    30.0

    150.0

    l INBO drive & promotion,

    general information of members & administrative management

     

     

     

    6.5

     

     

    6.5

     

     

    7.0

     

     

    7.0

     

     

    7.0

     

     

    34.0

    l INBO General Assemblies 1 GA/24 months

    32.0

    35.0

    67.0

    l Liaison Bureau

    2 meetings/18 months

    35.0

    17.5

    35.0

    17.5

    35.0

    140.0

    l Support to 3 regional networks

    40.0

    40.0

    40.0

    40.0

    40.0

    200.0

    l Associated Program permanent coordination and management

     

    30.0

    30.0

    30.0

    30.0

    30.0

    150.0

    l Publication of "The Network Newsletter"

    2 x 11.000 cop. / 18 months

    60.0

    30.0

    60.0

    30.0

    60.0

    240.0

     

    l 2 Internet Site

    INBO + RBO-AP/GWP

     

     

    15.0

     

    15.0

     

    15.0

     

    20.0

     

    20.0

     

    85.0

    SUB-TOTAL IN 1,000 US $

    INBO-Permanent Technical Sec.

     

    216,5

     

    201,0

     

    217,0

     

    209,5

     

    222,0

     

    1.066,0

     

    As the financial status of the RBOs seldom allow them to spend money on outside cooperation activities, there is a need for donor money

    The suggested activities fall into four different categories:

    1. Twinning for direct cooperation between existing, future or pilot basin organizations.
    2. The total budget for 22 different operations within 5 years and 3 regions is US $ 3,201,000

      That is to say an AVERAGE of US $ 145,000 per operation;

      This activity is partly operational within INBO members, and when so, 100% funded by the twines.

    3. Professional Support from existing organizations to help with the setting up, development and progress of other existing or new organizations.
    4. The total budget for 20 different operations within 5 years and 3 regions is US $ 8,250,000

      That is to say an AVERAGE of US $ 412,000 per operation;

      This activity is partly operational (i.e. Aegean rivers basin, Sabarmati river basin, Irtysh river basin, etc.) and then 100% funded.

      New development are opened (i.e. Vistula river basin, Rio San Juan & Rio Coco river basins).

    5. Synthesis of available knowledge and know-how. This activity would provide a good input to the toolbox and shall be conducted in close relationship with the FFA Toolbox team.
    6. The total budget for 15 different operations within 5 years and 3 regions is US $ 1,320,000

      That is to say an AVERAGE of US $ 88,000 per operation;

      This activity is not yet operational.

    7. Networking of documentation systems. This again is very close to the Toolbox initiative, and is implemented in close cooperation and without overlapping.

      The total budget for 16 different operations within 5 years and 3 regions is US $ 3,197,000

      That is to say an AVERAGE of US $ 199,000 per operation.

      This activity is partly operational: the Central unit (1/2 of the total budget) is 100% funded. Sums are already raised to begin in Poland, Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary and Brazil.

     

     

    SYNTHESIS OF FINANCING AS OF AUGUST 2000

    Figures within brackets are assumptions, name within brackets means "contact open with"

     

    Financing bilateral or multilateral donors

     

    Participating agencies or organizations

    Associated Program

    Actions

    International Cooperation Agencies,

    Bilateral Cooperation Agencies;

    INBO subscriptions,

    Country and member organizations contribution.

     

    OUTPUT N° 1: Twinning arrangements

    Global animation & coordination

    (Dutch Department for Public Works)

    Assumption of (50%) for north members, and (25%) for south ones: See i.e. Loire Bretagne & Rio Doce,

    Oum Er Bia & Adour Garonne,

    Rhin-Meuse & Apele Romane, etc.

    Latin America region

    (OAS)

    LANBO, SAMTAC, Gobierno de Mendoza ARGENTINA

    South Asia region

    SASTAC

    Central & Eastern Europe region

    CEETAC, APELE ROMANE, ICP RHINE, ICP DANUBE RIVER, RHONE-MEDITERRANEE-CORSE,

    Plus Lake Chad Commission, Zambeze Valley Authority,

     

    OUTPUT N° 2 Professional support

    Financing bi and multilateral donors Participating agencies or organizations

    World wide

     

    (IPTRD, ICOLD, ICID, SIE/ISW (social engineering), WMO, ACADEMIE DE L EAU (France),

    Latin America region

    i.e. Rios San Juan, & Coco (to be funded)

    (GEF 45%) & (FFEM 45%)

    (OAS),CATAC, LANBO, CCAD,

    Asia region

    i.e. AEGEAN RIVERS 100% funded

    i.e. SABARMATI 100% funded

    i.e. IRTYSCH 100% funded

    i.e. France 50 to 70% according to the case

    10% to 50% according to the case (see examples)

    National organizations are those of France, Russia, Kazakhstan, Gujarat (India), Poland, Ukraine, Bielorussia, Nicaragua, Honduras, Costa Rica, Turkey,

    SASTAC, Mekong River Commission, Red River Auth.; Mahaweli river Auth.

    CEE region

    i.e. VISTULA(to be funded)

    CEETAC, ICP BUG;

     

    OUTPUT N° 3 Synthesis of knowledge

    Financing bi and multilateral donors Participating agencies or organizations

    World wide

    (The World Bank)

    (Dutch Gov.)

    (OAS)

    (EC)

    Assumption (50%) to (25%) according to the case.

    IWSA, RBA TU DELFT, SIE/ISW, WUP Africa, The WB, CAPNET, RIVER BASIN INITIATIVE (CBD & RAMSAR convention), WUP Africa,

    Central America region

    CATAC

    South America region

    LANBO,

    South Asia region

    SASTAC,

    Central Eastern Europe region

    CEETAC

     

    OUTPUT N° 4 Documentation systems

    Financing bi and multilateral donors Participating agencies or organizations

    Central unit

    100% funded

    E.U.5%

    France-Italy-Spain 10%

    85% by ten Mediterranean countries

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION,STEAM PROJECT, SAWINET, EMWIS, WHYCOS,

    Latin-America region

    i.e. first phase in Brazil 100% funded

     

    France 50%

     

    Fed. Gov. of Brazil 50%

    CUNDINAMARCA (Colombia), CNA (Mexico), CATAC, BME (Brazil), etc.

    SAS region

    SASTAC

    CEE region

    i.e. first phase in 4 countries 100% funded

    France 50%

    Gov. of Poland, Czech Rep., Romania & Hungary 50%

    CEETAC, GDANSK WF (Poland), WRI & PODOVY MORAVI (Czech Republic), VITUKI (Hungary), APELE ROMANE (Romania),

    Other region

    i.e. WUP/1-2 & SAWINET 100% funded

    The W.B

    France

    & Germany